About Me

Name: Nathan Will...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

NARAL Sheds Tears Over Not Being Able to Kill Infants...

The Supreme Court made an unprecedented decision today, deciding that the Constitution, written by our founding fathers two hundred years ago, does not protect the right of a iffy-looking man to stab a baby about to be born in the back of the next, suck out his brains and make a lot of money off of it.

NARAL, of course, is hysterical. Candlelight vigils will be held for the procedure once claimed by pro-choice advocates to be non-existent. They are currently collecting coat hangers to stage a protest. Please send any that you may have.

In a press release, NARAL breathlessly stated, “The Court has given anti-choice state lawmakers the green light to open the flood gates and launch additional attacks on safe, legal abortion, without any regard for women's health.” NARAL is unable to see that pro-lifers actually do consider the woman’s health when opposing bans. Hence the reason why the ban was based on strong evidence that this procedure is only done on healthy women and, generally, healthy babies. Ironically, it is NARAL that never—and I literally mean never—has any regard for the health of the baby about to be aborted. The baby simply doesn't matter. This isn't an onion being aborted, it's a living person, and yet NARAL has the audacity to say that we don't consider the woman's health!

Their opposition to the ban further shows that they are, well, insane. All they can do is, despite all evidence, 1) claim the procedure does not exist, 2) insist that the procedure is “extremely rare” when their first claim is proven wrong and 3) insist that the thousands of these procedures done on women in the US every year are only in extreme circumstances when their second claim is disproved.

They haven’t come up with a new lie yet, even though their third claim is also shown to be false. And not just false, it’s a lie. Thankfully, the pro-choice movement is lead by liars and kept alive by liars. (Bill Clinton, anyone?)

"Indeed, this is a setback for all Americans who believe politicians should not make private, personal medical decisions for the rest of us." Unless of course we are talking about parents' rights when it comes to their daughters' abortions. According to NARAL, 14 year-old girls should be able to have a partial birth abortion without her parents even knowing that she is getting the procedure.

The problem with America is that no one knows about abortion law. They don't understand why this law is needed because, really, who would think of supporting it? Who in their right minds would approve of killing an unborn baby moments before birth? Most American people don't know about the procedure because they can't imagine something so barbaric happening in a country like America.

Thankfully for women who want to kill their baby's before birth, the pro-choice movement is there to be their noble helpers! Their opposition to such a law such as the Partial Birth Abortion Ban shows that their goal of abortion-on-demand is inconsistent, illogical and evil. I applaud the Supreme Court for doing the right thing. We are seeing the beginning of the end of Roe vs. Wade.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive