About Me

Name: Nathan Will...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

NARAL Sheds Tears Over Not Being Able to Kill Infants...

The Supreme Court made an unprecedented decision today, deciding that the Constitution, written by our founding fathers two hundred years ago, does not protect the right of a iffy-looking man to stab a baby about to be born in the back of the next, suck out his brains and make a lot of money off of it.

NARAL, of course, is hysterical. Candlelight vigils will be held for the procedure once claimed by pro-choice advocates to be non-existent. They are currently collecting coat hangers to stage a protest. Please send any that you may have.

In a press release, NARAL breathlessly stated, “The Court has given anti-choice state lawmakers the green light to open the flood gates and launch additional attacks on safe, legal abortion, without any regard for women's health.” NARAL is unable to see that pro-lifers actually do consider the woman’s health when opposing bans. Hence the reason why the ban was based on strong evidence that this procedure is only done on healthy women and, generally, healthy babies. Ironically, it is NARAL that never—and I literally mean never—has any regard for the health of the baby about to be aborted. The baby simply doesn't matter. This isn't an onion being aborted, it's a living person, and yet NARAL has the audacity to say that we don't consider the woman's health!

Their opposition to the ban further shows that they are, well, insane. All they can do is, despite all evidence, 1) claim the procedure does not exist, 2) insist that the procedure is “extremely rare” when their first claim is proven wrong and 3) insist that the thousands of these procedures done on women in the US every year are only in extreme circumstances when their second claim is disproved.

They haven’t come up with a new lie yet, even though their third claim is also shown to be false. And not just false, it’s a lie. Thankfully, the pro-choice movement is lead by liars and kept alive by liars. (Bill Clinton, anyone?)

"Indeed, this is a setback for all Americans who believe politicians should not make private, personal medical decisions for the rest of us." Unless of course we are talking about parents' rights when it comes to their daughters' abortions. According to NARAL, 14 year-old girls should be able to have a partial birth abortion without her parents even knowing that she is getting the procedure.

The problem with America is that no one knows about abortion law. They don't understand why this law is needed because, really, who would think of supporting it? Who in their right minds would approve of killing an unborn baby moments before birth? Most American people don't know about the procedure because they can't imagine something so barbaric happening in a country like America.

Thankfully for women who want to kill their baby's before birth, the pro-choice movement is there to be their noble helpers! Their opposition to such a law such as the Partial Birth Abortion Ban shows that their goal of abortion-on-demand is inconsistent, illogical and evil. I applaud the Supreme Court for doing the right thing. We are seeing the beginning of the end of Roe vs. Wade.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pro-Choicers Have the Audacity to Compare Pro-Lifers to Hitler!

The second some dense pro-lifer dare compare the holocaust (the focused slaughtering of millions of people) with abortion (the focused slaughtering of even more people) pro-choicers who otherwise would ridicule Jewish people come out of the shadows to declare the pro-lifer “ridiculous”, “anti-Semitic” and—their favorite—“stupid”.

Then, about ten seconds later, the same pro-choicer will make the usual insipid remarks about how “Hitler was against abortion”, triumphantly grinning in rhetorical victory. I don’t know if people realize how little this does for pro-choice apologetics, but I would compare it to the “George Bush is like Hitler!” mantra. Pro-choicers fail to see the irony of their movement accusing anyone—and I mean anyone, frankly including Hitler himself—of being "like Hitler".

For pro-lifers to compare the outcome of the holocaust (lots of dead people) with abortion (lots of dead people) is unacceptable to pro-choicers. They pretend not to grasp our correlation, looking like confused puppies who can do nothing but gnash their teeth and scream how we've just "taken it too far". And yet to insinuate that pro-life belief and Nazism go hand in hand because, well, they are both anti-abortion is totally acceptable and logical!

Besides the fact that Hitler was not anti-abortion (he was only anti-abortion when it came to “the right kind” of people--he wasn't a "fetus lover" like me, just an Aryan fetus lover), even if it were true it would not be a cementing argument for pro-choice belief but rather a bizarre twist in logic that anyone with a brain can see. But pro-choicers have no other choice but to make these kinds of remarks because their actual belief (killing children—specifically black children apparently...) is in actuality so close to Nazism that they scramble to associate the evil anti-choicers with it without actually thinking. They view us as jerks who want to control women—I don't see Hitler doing that anywhere. Let me check my history book here—that's right! Hitler did kill a lot of people however! And that's what the pro-choice movement advocates on a daily basis! What's more, they also hide behind their true objective (killing people) with a bunch of rhetoric. Hitler didn't just out and say, "Let's kill millions of people!" He did it secretly through rhetoric ("choice"), isolated and unregulated death camps (abortion clinics), brainwashing (public schools) and total control of the press ("mainstream" media).

Hitler also targeted certain kinds of people to kill—Planned Parenthood’s crusade against black people, anyone? Hitler insisted on total allegiance to the Nazi party—sound like NARAL’s work with the democratic party? Not to mention there are rumors that Hitler didn’t bathe—something one suspects of the people who advocate “choice” when they gather in large numbers.

Pro-lifers and Hitler? Well, both are against abortion. Though pro-lifers, I do seem to remember, don’t advocate the killing of even black or homosexual fetuses as "pro-life" Hitler would have.

So no, I'm not just comparing abortion to the holocaust, I am also comparing pro-choice thought and logic with Nazism in general. It's not just about "choice", it's about killing off the wrong kinds of people (poor black people, deformed people, people who stop their mothers from fitting into their prom dress).

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »